February 23, 2010

Verdict Of Nurse's Trial

ABC News has posted an article that follows up on an earlier post about a Texas nurse who was brought to trial and accused of harassment after sending an anonymous letter expressing concern over a doctor's practicing habits. The letter was deemed as "misuse of confidential information," which is a third class felony in Texas.

In trial, the jury took less than an hour to decide that Ms. Anne Mitchell was not guilty of harassment and all charges were dropped. She could have faced up to ten years in prison if she had been convicted. However, this does not repair the damage done to her reputation and professionally...all for expressing concern and reporting unsafe medical practices.

February 12, 2010

Texas Nurse To Stand Trial For Reporting Doctor

The New York Times has posted an article on a bizarre case where a nurse is to stand trial for writing a letter that reported Dr. Arafiles, of Kermit, Texas, to the Texas Department of State Health Services. The letter was deemed as “misuse of official information," which is a third-class felony in Texas. She was arrested and will go to trial.

Anne Mitchell and Vickilyn Galle, nurses, became concerned over Dr. Arafiles' "improper prescribing and surgical procedures." For example, he performed a skin graft in the emergency room that he was not allowed to do and also sutured a rubber tip to a patient's crushed finger, a very unusual remedy. They also mention an email where he recommended an herbal supplement that he sold on the side.

When Dr. Arafiles was told of an anonymous complaint, he complained to the sheriff that he was being harassed. The sheriff credits the doctor with saving his life after a heart attack and immediately obtained a search warrant where he discovered the letter written by Mitchell and Galle and began prosecution. Charges were dropped against Galle but not Mitchell. The hospital claims that it's difficult to recruit physicians to west Texas, but that they have reprimanded Dr. Arafiles several times.

The state and national nurses associations have called the prosecution an outrage and raised $40,000 for the defense. Legal experts argue that in a civil context, Mrs. Mitchell would seem to be protected by Texas whistle-blower laws.

The prosecution must prove that Mitchell used her position to obtain confidential information for "nongovernmental purposes" to get a conviction. The outcome of this case, whether it's a wrongful conviction or not, will certainly have a "chilling effect" on the reporting of medical malpractices.

February 3, 2010

Excess Radiation Causes Cancer Patient's Death

The Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog has posted an article about a medical negligence lawsuit regarding a cancer patient's death. Patricia Quirk was receiving radiation treatments for endometrial cancer in Chicago hospital and died of a perforated bowel.

Ms. Quirk's untimely death was caused by receiving 50% more radiation during the last two-thirds of her treatments, being basically "over-radiated." Appropriate amounts of radiation treatments can have unpleasant side effects such as fatigue, hair loss and nausea.

Yet when given in overwhelmingly large amounts, radiation can have disastrous effects on one's body, as the decedent's case unfortunately illustrates. The large doses of radiation eventually caused decedent's bowel to perforate, or tear, which resulted in a blood infection and her eventual death.

The decedent's family mourned the senseless loss of Patricia Quirk and argued that if common sense had been applied then the Chicago hospital's medical negligence could have been avoided. The decedent's radiation prescription was for 180 centigrays of radiation, yet she was given 270 centigrays. Plaintiff's attorneys argued that if the medical staff had simply reviewed the chart that the error would have been caught and the Chicago woman's wrongful death would have been avoided.
December 9, 2009

"FDA Reluctant to Discipline Doctors Found Guilty of Criminal Activities"

The Alabama Injury Lawyer Blog has posted an article that discusses the FDA's reluctance to discipline doctors and medical researchers who have committed crimes while carrying out research for the FDA.

According to government watchdog group, many of these criminally convicted health professionals are in charge of overseeing the safety of patients undergoing clinical trials, which calls into question how safe any of us are when it comes to medical research in general.

The article mentions one specific doctor who remained in practice for 11 years...

even though he had been convicted of 53 counts of criminal offense for, among other things, bribing an employee to conceal information about the attempted suicide of a clinical-trial patient and prescribing a drug without a license.

The FDA has the power to ban doctors from overseeing medical research if federal regulations are ignored while caring for clinical trial patients. The organization is also required to disqualify doctors who have been accused of other crimes, such as fraud.

The types of misconduct that can get a doctor debarred include submitting false information to the FDA, forging patient consent forms and not reporting when a patient has an adverse reaction to an experimental drug.

However, it may take as long as 4 years to apprehend the offending doctors.

October 17, 2009

Surgical Fires are Rare, but Preventable

The Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog has posted an entry about the risks of surgical fires and how to prevent them. There are roughly 550-650 surgical fires a year, with about 1-2 being fatal and 30 resulting in serious injuries.

The risk of being the victim of a surgical fire (or "flash fire") is rather low, but the article suggests that it is entirely too high considering the fires are completely preventable.

According to ECRI forensic investigators, most flash fires occur when high oxygen levels cause material like surgical sheets in the operating room, to ignite. High oxygen levels can often be found under these sheets or drapes. Other common causes of flash fires are alcohol-based cleaners. The cleaner must be fully dried before laying out the electronic surgical equipment. Otherwise, the vapors can ignite, causing a sudden flash fire.

The article brings up the recent case of Janice McCall, a 65 year old woman who sustained fatal injuries from a surgical fire in a hospital in Illinois. She was badly burned before operating room staff could put out the fire; no one else was injured. Ms. McCall was rushed to another hospital in Tennessee with severe burns and died six days later.

October 12, 2009

Tired Doctors Make More Errors

The Indiana Injury Law Blog has posted an article about "internal factors" that cause doctors to make fatal medical errors. A Mayo Clinic study has shown that the amount of medical mistakes made by residents increases with the doctor's stress and fatigue. The study followed 430 medical residents who were questioned every three months from 2003 to 2008 about their stress levels, burnout, sleepiness, fatigue, depression and the number of medical errors they made.

• Out of 370 residents who answered questions about medical errors, 39 percent admitted that they had made at least one major medical error. • There was also a connection between these medical errors and tiredness. The researchers found that for every single point increase in fatigue, the resident's chances of making a medical error increased by 14 percent. • Also, for every single point increase in the sleepiness score, the chances of making an error increased by 10 percent. • Besides sleepiness and fatigue, medical errors were also more frequently seen in doctors suffering from depression, or experiencing burnout symptoms.

Clearly, a doctor's quality of life is directly related to how he/she will care for patients. Every year approximately 100,000 people die from "preventable medical errors" in the U.S.

August 15, 2009

Cross-Examining Defense Doctors

The Baltimore Injury Lawyer Blog has posted an article about the cross-examination of defense doctors because of financial incentive.

Maryland law allows discovery of how much a professional witness earns from testifying, as well as what percentage of his overall income is earned from working as a paid witness.

It's generally a bad idea to take the doctor's word for the amount he/she is paid by the defense attorneys or insurance company for their testimony. Acquiring a subpoena to obtain the actual records is much more reliable. Usually, before the financial statement is produced, the doctor backs out of testifying.

The doctors and the defense bar think we do this because we know that if the records are ordered to be produced the doctor will refuse to testify. Obviously that makes my job as plaintiff’s counsel easier. The truth of the matter is that we subpoena these records because it is the only way to ensure a good cross-examination.

There aren't many defense doctors testifying in Alabama, but this is still an important strategy to keep in mind.

May 24, 2009

"The Myth of Huge Medical Malpractice Payouts"

The Florida Personal Injury Lawyer Blog has posted an article about the "myth" of huge settlements from medical malpractice lawsuits.

Expecting to receive millons of dollars in compensation, in most cases, isn't realistic.
According to the article, less than 10% of malpractice suits in Maine, Florida, Nevada, and Missouri had payouts of $1 million or more.

...multi-million dollar verdicts in these cases are not as prevalent as believed. Not only is the investigatory process expensive due to all of the medical records that need to be compiled and all of the expert witness testimony required, but more often than not, it takes years to get one of these cases to trial. Finally, once the case gets to trial, juries are many times very reluctant to award large damage amounts because they have heard all the erroneous stories about the huge jury awards in some cases.

The typical payout is $278,000-$350,000 for long-term and life-altering injuries or ailments. For "temporary or emotional injuries" the average payout is $5,000-$79,000. However, the article does warn that most medical malpractice suits end without the person seeking compensation receiving any.

Actually, only one in eight preventable medical errors committed in hospitals results in a malpractice claim and punitive damages are awarded in less than 1 percent of medical malpractice cases.

May 13, 2009

"Should Courts Force Doctors to Confess Their Own Negligence to Their Patients?"

The Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog has posted an article that discusses if courts should force doctors to admit malpractice to their patients.

University of Baltimore law professor Richard W. Bourne wrote an article published this year in the Arkansas Law Review articulating the theory that there should be an independent tort claim when a doctor destroys evidence or when a doctor fails to disclose to the patient that there has been a breach of the appropriate standard of care that causes injury. Professor Bourne would limit this tort to cases where (1) the wrong is serious, and (2) the failure to reveal is intentional.

Ironically, many times when doctors destroy documents to cover their own tracks, they come across as worse to the jury and therefore are more harshly treated than if they had just been honest in the first place.

...a lot of Maryland doctors who want to rid the medical profession of dishonest doctors would also support a tort to punish doctors who deliberately destroy evidence and/or do not reveal to the patient that serious medical malpractice has been committed.
April 29, 2009

Independent Medical Examiners Altered Injury Reports

The Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog has posted an article about Independent Medical Examination (IME) doctors. The post also cites an article from the New York Times.

The general idea behind independent medical exam doctors is

to flush out workers who exaggerate injuries or get unnecessary care, and there is no question that some of that goes on.

However, several times the IME will tell the patient one thing and write another on their chart. Results are often altered so the insurance company has to pay the least amount of compensation money.

Patients have had injuries recorded differently or omitted entirely from their medical charts without any knowledge. However, patients now have the advantage of technology and often times have the doctor's diagnosis recorded on their phones...proof that they were told one thing and another was written down to benefit insurance companies.

April 11, 2009

Lawsuit Over Pharmacy Mistake

The Chicago Personal Injury Blog has posted an article that discusses a lawsuit brought against an Illinois-based Walgreen's pharmacy. A 77 year old man was prescribed anti-gout medication, but the pharmacy accidentally gave him a medicine that lowers diabetics' blood sugar. His kidneys failed as a result and the jury awarded him $6.35 million in compensatory damages. The man died during pretrial proceedings. The pharmacist who filled the prescription was called into court.

At trial, the Walgreen's pharmacist testified that he incorrectly filled the decedent's prescription. Evidence was also presented that suggested the pharmacist was abusing narcotics and stealing pharmaceuticals from the Walgreen’s store. The evidence showed that the pharmacist did not remember if he was taking drugs on the date of the misfilled prescription.

According to Robert Kreisman, author of the article, in the trial, the attorneys for the decedent said that Walgreen's failed to keep an accurate inventory when it came to government controlled medications. They said

if Walgreens had been paying attention, then this pharmacist would have been fired much sooner and would have not been the pharmacist on the job when the decedent’s prescription was filled.