February 27, 2009

What We Think Of Telephone Depositions

To gently ease into the topic: We hate them. Without question.

Having said that, here is an interesting post from Evan Schaeffer of the Trial Practice Blog about telephone depositions.

To make sure we are clear - what we mean by a telephone deposition is that the witness is somewhere else with a court reporter and often with his attorney. You are appearing by speakerphone. The advantage is no travel and thus it is quicker and cheaper. The disadvantages are you can't see the witness (some use video conferencing to correct this problem - we have not tried this yet) and handling documents becomes more difficult. Our experience has been with bad connections over the phone and just not being in sync with the witness who is sitting in a conference room a thousand miles away. Maybe we'll try them again one day but so far we have kept our vow for five years - no telephone depositions!

February 3, 2009

New Blog From James Publishing - Excellent Articles On Deposing Doctors

Check out this interesting new blog - has excerpts of books related to litigation. Thanks to The Trial Practice Tips blog for letting us know about this excellent resource.

February 1, 2009

Good Collection Of Mistakes In Depositions

Our friend Evan Schaeffer has a three part series on 15 ways to really foul up depositions. Here is part one - look for the others either here or directly on his wonderful blog The Trial Practice Tips

July 17, 2008

Deposition Tip - When The Witness Answers A Question Not Asked

Sometimes a witness will answer a question that you did not ask. This is sometimes done intentionally and sometimes it is unintentional. For example, in a car wreck case the defendant driver may be asked:

"When did you hit your brakes before the impact?"

The answer may be "I was always going under the speed limit."

That is an answer that was not asked for - instead the defendant was asked about when he hit the brakes - not how fast he was going. Normally the best approach is to say:

"Thank you. Now my question was actually when did you hit your brakes before impact."

The Illinois Trial Blog has a good post today on this subject and has some excellent suggestions on how to proceed. Depositions usually have some of these moments in them and its always good to have some options on how to proceed.

July 5, 2008

Deposition Tip - Move On After Getting A Good Answer!

The excellent South Carolina Trial Law Blog has referenced a great article by Illinois Trial Practice Blog on not asking a witness again about an area that you have received a good response... It is always tempting to try and get an even better answer but we should remember that once we get a good response it usually is wise to leave it alone.

Here is a brief excerpt from the post at the Illinois Trial Practice Blog:
Why give the witness a chance to change or explain his answer? I can think of only a couple of reasons, neither of them very good: (1) You're not sure whether you've pinned the witness down or (2) you can't remember what the witness said.

Both of these possibilities should be dealt with on the first go-round. First, pin the witness down after you get good testimony. Second, take good notes. Then move on to the next area of questioning--never to return until trial, when it will be much easier to impeach the witness than during the deposition when you have no transcript.

Good advice.

July 1, 2008

Deposition Tips - Boxing In Or Being Boxed In

A great blog is The Illinois Trial Practice Weblog and this post discusses boxing witnesses in. If you are going to be deposed, you will find this interesting to know what to expect from a good lawyer. You may also want to check out our other posts on deposition tips.

June 1, 2008

What Is The Reason The Defendant Wants To Take My Deposition?

Sometimes our clients ask us why the defendant wants to take their deposition. The short answer is the defendant wants to know what you know and wants to pin you down on your testimony.

The defendant (and her lawyer) are entitled to find out the answers to questions such as:

1. What injuries do you have;
2. What do you remember about the wreck;
3. How has your health or daily activities been affected;
4. What did the defendant say to you at the scene;
5. Etc.

While sometimes it can be annoying (and there are certainly annoying depositions taken!) this is a right the defendant normally has and it should not be upsetting or troubling. If you will listen to the question, understand the question, think of the truthful response, and then only answer the question, the deposition will go very smoothly for you.

Remember that you (your attorney) gets to ask the defendant the same types of questions to find out what the defendant knows and to pin down the defendant on what her testimony will be. Depositions help cases to settle and the ones that don't settle it helps to prepare everyone for trial.

February 11, 2008

Fourth Key To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Only Answer The Question Asked

Once you have heard the question, understood it, and thought about the truthful answer, the time has come to answer the question and only the question. In some ways, this is the hardest thing in a deposition.

The reason is that often defense lawyers ask questions that “suggest” something negative. For example, “Isn’t it true that you did not even go the emergency room on the 24th when the wreck happened?” The factual and truthful answer may be “Yes that’s true” but we want to add a “but I did go the next day” or “but I thought I was OK and then couldn’t move in the morning” or some similar answer. We don’t want to leave the wrong impression or allow the defense lawyer to create the wrong impression so we start to “explain” or “argue” or “expand” our answer. This must be avoided.

Your obligation is to simply answer the question. Not the unasked question (“I knew she was going to ask me how fast I was going so I went ahead and answered it”). Your obligation is not to argue or explain unless you are asked to do so. You have to trust your lawyer to know in a deposition when to ask you questions and when to save certain matters for trial.

So, as a recap – when a question is asked:

First – did you hear it
Second – did you understand it
Third – think about the truthful answer
Fourth – only answer the question.

There is much more to being prepared for a deposition but we hope this series of articles has been of some benefit to you. As always, if you are not represented by a lawyer and would like to discuss a personal injury claim with us, please fill out the “contact us” form on the left hand side of this blog and one of our lawyers will personally respond to you the same day

February 11, 2008

Third Key To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Take Time To Think About The Truthful Answer

After hearing and understanding the question, the third key is to simply take the right amount of time to think about what the truthful answer is to the question. “How long is the ‘right amount’ of time?” That’s easy – whatever amount of time it takes you to be able to truthfully answer the question.

Some questions will be easy – “What’s your name” for example. Others will take you some time to think about – “Describe each and every injury you suffered in the wreck” – you will want to carefully consider this question so that you fully answer the question.

Sometimes our clients worry that if they take too long the defense lawyer will think they are not smart. Who cares? If you take the amount of time you need then it doesn’t matter what the defense lawyer thinks of you. You are under an obligation to answer truthfully and that is all that matters. Ultimately, whether the defense lawyer likes you or not is not critical – what is critical is to answer truthfully so you do not face attacks at trial because you rushed an answer and gave an incorrect answer.

So, make sure you hear and understand the question and then take however long it takes to think of the truthful answer. Once you do this, then you need to only answer the question asked.

February 11, 2008

Second Key To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Understand The Question

If you haven’t already, please read the first post “Four Keys To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Background” and the second post “First Key To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Hear The Question”.

So, we heard the question asked. Does this mean we automatically answer? No. We need to understand the question.

Let’s go back to our police station example. The detective is trying to pin a murder on you (we will trust you did NOT do it!) and he asks you a question. Very loudly. No doubt about you hearing it. So that’s it, right? Well, what if the question is asked in Latin and you (like us) have no idea how to speak Latin? Can you truthfully say “Yes” or “No” or anything else other than “I don’t understand the question”?

OK, maybe that’s a silly example but the point is valid – you can’t swear or affirm you are telling the truth when you don’t understand the question!

What if the detective asks you a question in English but uses two words that you don’t understand. What should you do? Keep in mind a deposition (or a detective interview) is not a conversation – it is an interrogation. The difference is the goal of a conversation is to understand each other. The goal of an interrogation is to get information (that is answers) out of the person being interrogated. Particularly to get admissions or confessions.

So, if you don’t understand certain words and you still say “No” or whatever your answer is, and that fits the detective’s picture of how the crime occurred, will he be concerned about whether you understood every word? Probably not.

For example – “Did you perpetrate a fraud to gain access to the victim’s domicile?” Most of us don’t use “perpetrate” and “domicile” in every day conversation – if you don’t know what those words mean, you cannot truthfully answer without getting an explanation.

Similarly, in a civil deposition you might be asked, “Do you agree that if you saw the truck veering into your lane and you did not immediately swerve off the side of the road and dodge the telephone pole, you would be guilty of contributory negligence?” Did you hear that? First step. Always. Did you understand it? Most people who are not lawyers and even a lot of lawyers who don’t practice in Alabama (we are one of only a few states that use “contributory negligence”) don’t know what contributory negligence is. How can we agree (“Yes”) or disagree (“No”) if we don’t know what every word is? We can’t. [By the way this question has other problems but we are focusing just on this second key – understanding].

What if we understand every word but not the question as a whole? Here’s an example – “Did you tell him that after you saw the man that he said to the other guy that second man had a knife?” Did you hear the question? First step. Always. Yes we heard it. Do we understand it? No – which “he” and which “man” and which “guy” is the detective talking about?

OK, bottom line – what do we do if we don’t understand either a word or the question as a whole? Just like with not hearing – we ask the lawyer to repeat the question and rephrase it or explain what a word means that we don’t understand. It is simple but so powerful – we don’t answer questions that we don’t understand as otherwise how will we know we are telling the truth? No matter what the other lawyer may do – what facial expressions – what he or she might say – you do not have any obligation to answer any question you do not understand. If for some reason the lawyer will not make it understandable, you can simply say, “I don’t understand your question so I can’t answer it.”

Sometimes clients are reluctant to say they didn’t understand a question because they fear it would make them look not smart. First, it does not matter what the other lawyer thinks of you. What matters is your testimony must be truthful. Second, most questions that are not understandable are that way because the lawyer asked questions in a confusing way – not because you lack any intelligence!

If, however, you hear and understand the question, the third key is to take time to really think about what the truthful answer is. This is covered in “Third Key To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Take Time To Think About The Truthful Answer”.

February 11, 2008

First Key To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Hear The Question

If you haven’t already, please read the first post “Four Keys To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Background”.

The first key to being prepared for a deposition is to make sure you have this firmly planted deep in your mind – you must hear the question. We know this sounds so basic – maybe even childish but let’s examine it.

Remember our metaphor of going to a police station and being accused of murder? The detective asks you questions and records your answers. What would you do if he asked you a question and you only heard half of the question? Maybe the fan comes on. Maybe someone rattles a cup full of ice. Maybe someone coughs. Maybe he is a “low talker” like the famous Seinfeld episode. Maybe he intentionally or unintentionally turns away from you or looks down at notes while he is talking. Whatever the reason – how would you answer this – “Isn’t it true that …… 3 o’clock ….. at the victim’s house?”

Do you say “Yes” because you were at the victim’s house? That part is true but is “Yes” a true response to the parts you did not hear? What if the parts you didn’t hear included “and you had a gun in your hand” when you didn’t? Would it be truthful or would it be a lie to say “Yes” to that?

Remember the goal is to always answer the question asked in a truthful and accurate manner. You have sworn or affirmed to tell the truth. How can you do that if you don’t even hear all of the words of the question? You can’t.

The only time you should answer a question is when you have heard the question. That means every word of the question.

What do you do if you haven’t heard every word of the question? Simply ask the person to repeat the question.

Over the last 24 years of actively defending hundreds of depositions of our clients, we have had only one lawyer ever (and it was just once) refuse to repeat a question when asked to by our client. That was fine as our client did not have to do anything but sit there. If there is no question asked, no answer is required. When the lawyer realized he could not intimidate our client, he moved on.

There truly is much power in this first rule – if you don’t hear the question (all of it), you don’t answer the question. If you do hear the question (all of it) then you go to the next rule, which is to make sure you understand each and every word of the question and you understand the question as a whole. This is addressed in the post “Second Key To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Understand The Question”.

February 11, 2008

Four Keys To Alabama Plaintiffs Being Prepared For Depositions – Background

When we represent Alabama clients who have been injured or who have suffered through the wrongful death of a family member, one of the more stressful events for them that they think about at the beginning of the case is being deposed by the defense lawyers. This series of blog posts describes part of what we do to turn the stress from this event into positive energy that will make giving a deposition good practice for testifying live in front of a jury.

Before we start on the four keys, a little background information is appropriate. For those who have never given a deposition, it is where the other lawyers are allowed to question you under oath about virtually anything – as long as it is somewhat related to the case. This would include details about the truck wreck, the fraud, your doctor visits, your lost income, your pain and suffering, your permanent injury, your background, etc.

We will be there in the conference room when you are deposed and we can object if there is an improper question asked. If we do not object, you must answer the question truthfully. The rules we are suggesting in these blog posts will help you to truthfully answer the question that is asked.

We often suggest that our clients consider what you would do if you were taken down to the police station and told you were suspected of being a murderer. How would you answer questions (well, you would call a lawyer but just pretend you could not do that – you have to answer the questions in this little exercise) that were asked? Keep this in mind as we go through these four rules.

Finally, these blog posts are not a substitute for meeting and spending a lot of time with your lawyers – this is just to give you a taste of how to start getting prepared in general terms for your deposition. Of course, in your case, we would address specific details of your case that we can’t do in these posts.

So, what are the four keys?

First, make sure you hear the question that is asked. Each word and the entire question.
Second, make sure you understand the question – each word and the question as a whole.
Third, take whatever time you need to think about the truthful answer to the question.
Fourth, and for most of us the hardest one – answer only the question asked.

Each of the next four blog posts will take a look at these four rules or suggestions.

We hope and trust this series of blog posts is of some help to you – that is our desire.