Posted On: February 23, 2010

Verdict Of Nurse's Trial

ABC News has posted an article that follows up on an earlier post about a Texas nurse who was brought to trial and accused of harassment after sending an anonymous letter expressing concern over a doctor's practicing habits. The letter was deemed as "misuse of confidential information," which is a third class felony in Texas.

In trial, the jury took less than an hour to decide that Ms. Anne Mitchell was not guilty of harassment and all charges were dropped. She could have faced up to ten years in prison if she had been convicted. However, this does not repair the damage done to her reputation and professionally...all for expressing concern and reporting unsafe medical practices.

Posted On: February 12, 2010

Texas Nurse To Stand Trial For Reporting Doctor

The New York Times has posted an article on a bizarre case where a nurse is to stand trial for writing a letter that reported Dr. Arafiles, of Kermit, Texas, to the Texas Department of State Health Services. The letter was deemed as “misuse of official information," which is a third-class felony in Texas. She was arrested and will go to trial.

Anne Mitchell and Vickilyn Galle, nurses, became concerned over Dr. Arafiles' "improper prescribing and surgical procedures." For example, he performed a skin graft in the emergency room that he was not allowed to do and also sutured a rubber tip to a patient's crushed finger, a very unusual remedy. They also mention an email where he recommended an herbal supplement that he sold on the side.

When Dr. Arafiles was told of an anonymous complaint, he complained to the sheriff that he was being harassed. The sheriff credits the doctor with saving his life after a heart attack and immediately obtained a search warrant where he discovered the letter written by Mitchell and Galle and began prosecution. Charges were dropped against Galle but not Mitchell. The hospital claims that it's difficult to recruit physicians to west Texas, but that they have reprimanded Dr. Arafiles several times.

The state and national nurses associations have called the prosecution an outrage and raised $40,000 for the defense. Legal experts argue that in a civil context, Mrs. Mitchell would seem to be protected by Texas whistle-blower laws.

The prosecution must prove that Mitchell used her position to obtain confidential information for "nongovernmental purposes" to get a conviction. The outcome of this case, whether it's a wrongful conviction or not, will certainly have a "chilling effect" on the reporting of medical malpractices.

Posted On: February 3, 2010

Excess Radiation Causes Cancer Patient's Death

The Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog has posted an article about a medical negligence lawsuit regarding a cancer patient's death. Patricia Quirk was receiving radiation treatments for endometrial cancer in Chicago hospital and died of a perforated bowel.

Ms. Quirk's untimely death was caused by receiving 50% more radiation during the last two-thirds of her treatments, being basically "over-radiated." Appropriate amounts of radiation treatments can have unpleasant side effects such as fatigue, hair loss and nausea.

Yet when given in overwhelmingly large amounts, radiation can have disastrous effects on one's body, as the decedent's case unfortunately illustrates. The large doses of radiation eventually caused decedent's bowel to perforate, or tear, which resulted in a blood infection and her eventual death.

The decedent's family mourned the senseless loss of Patricia Quirk and argued that if common sense had been applied then the Chicago hospital's medical negligence could have been avoided. The decedent's radiation prescription was for 180 centigrays of radiation, yet she was given 270 centigrays. Plaintiff's attorneys argued that if the medical staff had simply reviewed the chart that the error would have been caught and the Chicago woman's wrongful death would have been avoided.